A full website rebuild is proposed
Check whether the problem is really site-wide or concentrated in a few pages or customer paths.
Second technical opinion
Were you offered a full redesign? Check whether the whole scope is actually needed
Send the website and a short list of proposed changes. We separate them into three groups: change now, postpone, and verify before changing.
The goal is not to judge another contractor, but to understand the scope, risks and what should be preserved.
Example decision map
KeepPages that work and carry value
Change nowWhat genuinely blocks the inquiry path
Verify firstHypotheses without data or with search risk
Quick navigation
Jump to the situation closest to yours.
When it is useful
Especially before an expensive decision or changes that are hard to reverse
A second opinion is useful when you already have a proposal but are unsure whether the whole scope is equally necessary right now.
The website has a long search history
Review which URLs, content and structure may have accumulated value and should not disappear accidentally.
You received very different estimates
Compare not technology names, but what each item actually changes for the customer or website owner.
The new website is already being built
Individual decisions can still be reviewed before launch without restarting the entire project.
Result
You receive a short decision map, not another list of dozens of tasks
For every important item, we explain why it is needed, how urgent it is and what should be verified before work starts.
KeepWhat already works, carries search or business value and is not causing a problem.
Change nowFailures and barriers that genuinely prevent visitors from finding what they need or making an inquiry.
Verify firstLarge or risky changes whose benefit cannot be judged honestly without evidence.
Boundaries
We assess proposed changes, not another contractor's motives or professionalism
Without full project context, it would be unfair to judge someone else's work. We can, however, review the scope, risks and the link between each major change and a real website problem.
Review the proposal
Send the website and 3–7 main changes you were offered
No contracts or confidential documents are needed. A URL and a short list of proposed work are enough.