Vectora Research

Which website problems appear most often — and what to check on yours

We summarised 220 detailed manual website reviews to show which problems repeated most often, how the patterns differed by industry, and what an owner can check on their own site in a few minutes.

These figures apply only to our working sample. They help choose what to check, but they do not automatically score a specific website.

vectora/research
Data
Recurring review signals
45websites with an explicitly described mobile-path problem
25where the next step or main action was hard to find
17with an explicit website, button or form failure
Quick navigation
See what to check first and how the patterns differ by industry.
What to check first

Five concrete problems that recurred during manual website reviews

The sample includes 220 unique websites with enough manual review detail to identify concrete recurring problems. Categories can overlap, so one website may contain more than one issue.

45of 220

Problematic mobile path

The main action gets lost on a phone, the page is overloaded, or an important route is difficult to complete.

26of 220

Projects do not lead to an estimate

Photos and examples exist, but after viewing them the visitor cannot see a concrete next step.

25of 220

The next step gets lost

Booking, estimate, contact or another main action is not clear enough at the moment it is needed.

24of 220

The website trails behind the current business

Structure or presentation creates a weaker impression than the actual level of the company.

17of 220

There is an explicit technical failure

The website does not open, a key button fails, a form errors, or a technical issue is visible on the page.

The count is conservative: a signal was counted only when the problem was explicitly described in the review text. These values are not a full prevalence estimate of every possible issue.

Same issue, different manifestation

Different industries tend to have weak points in different parts of the customer path

This is not an industry ranking. It is a clue about where a specific business owner should look more closely.

Windows and doors14 of 17

Personalised reviews explicitly mentioned a mobile-path problem. For this industry, test whether estimate and measurement are obvious on a phone.

Dentistry13 of 39

A mobile issue was explicitly described; another 10 of 39 mentioned outdated structure or presentation. Review the path from service to doctor and booking.

Furniture4 of 23

A conservative text check explicitly finds the project-to-estimate problem. Portfolio should not only prove quality; it should help form an inquiry.

Stretch ceilings4 of 15

A lost next step or a difficult route from projects to estimate recurred. After a gallery, do not leave the visitor without a clear action.

Small samples cannot represent an entire industry. This section only shows patterns that actually repeated in the available manual reviews.

Broader working sample

Where an explicit issue was confirmed less often — and where more often

The tables do not contain one standardised design score for every industry, so they cannot honestly name the “most modern websites”. What they can compare is the share of websites marked as having a real practical issue.

Boilers / heating5 of 86 · 6%
Rental5 of 56 · 9%
Furniture24 of 131 · 18%
Dentistry34 of 179 · 19%
Windows and doors21 of 82 · 26%
Stretch ceilings19 of 68 · 28%
Repair services15 of 36 · 42%
A low share does not mean every website in the industry is modern or strong. It only means an explicit practical issue was confirmed less often in this specific working sample.
Apply this to your website

Five checks that are more useful than a generic “website score”

You can run these checks in a few minutes without technical knowledge.

01

Open it on a phone

Is the next action obvious? Do menus, banners or floating buttons cover important content?

02

Walk the main customer route

From the entry page to booking, estimate or inquiry. Where do you have to stop and search for the next step?

03

Click every key action

Phone, form, messenger, booking, estimate. The question is not whether a button exists, but whether the scenario works end to end.

04

Compare the website with the business today

Are services, team, geography, projects, prices and contacts current?

05

Check what you measure

Can you see form submissions, phone clicks and other meaningful actions so the next change is not based on guesswork?

Your website

Want to check these five points on your website?

Send the address. Instead of comparing it with an average score, we will review the concrete path and say what genuinely needs attention.

Review one website

Email and the website address are enough. Add a concrete concern if you have one.

For the first review, contact details and the website address are enough. Do not send passwords or access credentials.

Thank you. We received the website.

We will check the key points on your website and send a short initial assessment to the email you provided. We will suggest a next step only if it is genuinely needed.